The right BESS for the job: Key factors for profitability and market fit
The right BESS for the job: Key factors for profitability and market fit
Mayur Andulkar
6 min read
As the energy transition accelerates, battery energy storage systems (BESS) are playing a crucial role in stabilizing power grids, integrating renewables, and optimizing electricity markets. But not all BESS are created equal. Their efficiency, capacity, and cost structure determine how they deliver profitability and long-term value.
Choosing the right system is not just about picking the most advanced technology - it’s about finding the best fit for market conditions, revenue opportunities, and regulatory requirements. Energy storage is not a one-size-fits-all solution; rather, the ideal configuration depends on technical performance, financial feasibility, and market participation strategy.
In this article, we explore the key factors that influence BESS profitability, the trade-offs between different storage configurations, and how operators can optimize their systems for maximum returns.
The economic success of a battery storage system depends on several interconnected factors. Understanding these elements is crucial for ensuring long-term profitability and operational efficiency.
A battery’s round-trip efficiency determines how much energy is lost between charging and discharging. Higher efficiency (typically 85-95%) means less wasted energy, enabling greater revenue capture from market price spreads.
However, while high-efficiency batteries generate more energy per cycle, they also tend to come with higher upfront costs. Therefore, a careful assessment is needed to determine if the additional investment in efficiency is justified by higher revenue potential.
One of the most critical decisions when selecting a BESS is determining the optimal storage duration. Different applications require different storage configurations:
Short-duration storage (2-4 hours) is well-suited for markets with frequent price fluctuations, such as intraday trading and frequency response services. These systems operate multiple times per day, capturing profits from rapid changes in electricity prices.
Medium-duration storage (6-8 hours) is ideal for balancing daily demand peaks and participating in multiple market services, offering a balanced approach between flexibility and energy shifting.
Long-duration storage (8+ hours) is primarily used for renewable energy integration and peak shaving. These systems charge when renewable generation is high and discharge when demand spikes, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
In addition to storage duration, the power-to-capacity ratio also matters. A high power-to-capacity ratio (e.g., 1:1) is designed for short bursts of energy, while a lower ratio (e.g., 1:3) focuses on extended discharge periods.
A BESS makes money by capitalizing on electricity market price differences. But not all storage systems can capture value in the same way.
Arbitrage opportunities occur when a battery charges during low-price periods and discharges when prices peak.
Ancillary services markets reward fast-response batteries for providing frequency regulation and other stability services.
Capacity markets compensate storage systems for ensuring grid reliability during peak demand.
While Levelized Cost of Storage (LCOS) is commonly used to evaluate storage economics, it often oversimplifies the complex interaction between technology, cost structure, and market dynamics. Instead, a dynamic profitability assessment should factor in:
Revenue simulations based on real-time market trends.
Capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operational costs (OPEX).
Market participation strategies and regulatory constraints.
The following table compares three typical BESS configurations based on efficiency, storage duration, and cost structure.
A BESS should not only be profitable but also grid-compatible. Storage operators must ensure that their systems comply with grid stability and congestion management regulations while maximizing financial returns.
Regulatory compliance: Grid operators impose rules on how batteries interact with the network to maintain stability. Storage systems must comply with charging and discharging restrictions to avoid grid congestion.
Revenue stacking: The most profitable storage systems combine multiple revenue streams - from energy arbitrage and ancillary services to capacity payments and demand response programs.
Lifecycle cost management: High cycling rates can shorten a battery’s lifespan, so it’s crucial to find an operational balance that ensures long-term profitability.
At Re-Twin Energy, we provide BESS stakeholders with the tools and insights needed to make informed decisions on storage deployment and operations. Our platform helps storage owners:
Evaluate different storage configurations to determine the most profitable setup.
Analyze market conditions to identify the best operational model.
Ensure compliance with grid requirements while optimizing market participation.
By leveraging Re-Twin’s advanced analytics, energy storage investors can select the right system, maximize profitability, and stay ahead in evolving energy markets.
